Blondie, my favorite user on here and my favorite post punk act to come out the 70's NYC scene.
edit: Oh I wish Blondie would call me anytime, anywhere that I am.
if only it was so easy to change our looks in real life........
Blondie, my favorite user on here and my favorite post punk act to come out the 70's NYC scene.
edit: Oh I wish Blondie would call me anytime, anywhere that I am.
this is what i found in the transcript related to the date august 14 2015 (royal comision of australia):.
18 q. and if they don't actively disassociate, then they 19 will be disfellowshipped as apostate?
20 a. no, an apostate is someone who actively goes against 21 what the bible teaches.. this is a half true.
Yeah it's pretty interesting how often he said stuff "wasn't his field"
That may be true. I'm sure some GB members are more familiar things than others. But at the end of the day, the buck stops with the GB, with him.
in today's wt study it makes the point that just glancing at the opposite sex is flirting and can lead to sex!.
so are jw's now to wear blinkers?.
also jw's are told to go and confess to the elders if they have any immoral thoughts?!!.
Yeah that's always been a weird one for me, James. Song of Solomon is ALLLLLLLLL about how hot that chick is and how bad Solomon wants to fuck her raw.
But for some reason it's prophetic and therefore ok.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nuwt4flyl-k .
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
.
https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/case-study/636f01a5-50db-4b59-a35e-a24ae07fb0ad/case-study-29,-july-2015,-sydney.
guys what the hell is going on, how can jackson say there were no isrealite women judges!!!
!how many jewish women judges are there?cdidnt maclellan check up om that one, would have thought he'd know!
!
i thought at the end, stewart made brilliant use of scripture (about establishing fornication or other sexually immoral practises) how, in such a clever way stewart used scripture to point out that some one could basically stake out someone's house to see if a person stayed over night be they homosexual or heterosexual............that on the basis of a sort of stakeout, the two witness rule was ambivalent yet it prevailed.
due to sufficient suspicion.. and therefore why did this "suspicion" not prevail with child sexual abuse.